Honour Crimes

Almost two-thirds (69%) of young British Asians aged 16-34 consider that families should live according to the concept of ‘honour’ or ‘izzat’. The proportion is lowest among Asian Christians (62%) and Hindus (64%) and greatest for Muslims (70%) and Sikhs (79%).

This is one of the findings of a ComRes poll undertaken on behalf of the BBC as background for a Panorama special on ‘Britain’s Crimes of Honour’, being broadcast tonight (BBC One, 8.30 pm). 500 young Asians living in Britain were interviewed by telephone between 23 and 27 February 2012. Data tables are available at:

http://www.comres.co.uk/polls/BBC_Blakeway_Honour_Crime_Feb12.pdf

A similar number of respondents (66%) argued that, while ‘izzat’ exists in some sections of society, its extent has been exaggerated by the media. This was particularly felt by young Asian Muslims (73%) and Sikhs (72%), less so by Christians (65%) or Hindus (53%).

Backing for the extremer manifestations of ‘izzat’ was small. Thus, only 6% of all young Asians believed that, in certain circumstances, it could be right to punish physically a female member of the family if she brought dishonour to it or the community. No Sikhs agreed with this, but 9% of Hindus, 8% of Christians, and 6% of Muslims did so.

Notwithstanding, three times this number (i.e. 18%) in the entire sample selected one or more of five ‘reasonable justifications’ for physical punishment of female members of the family. The figure was highest among Asian Christians (23%), followed by Muslims (20%), Sikhs (14%), and Hindus (13%).

The relative weight attached to each of the five justifications varied somewhat, but generally disobeying paternal wishes was the top concern for Asian Christians (10%), going out in the evening unaccompanied most perturbed Muslims (9%), and wanting to terminate an existing or prearranged marriage preoccupied Sikhs (9%).

The ultimate punishment of ‘honour killing’ was sanctioned by 3% of young Asians, including the same number of Muslims and Hindus, but rising to 4% of Sikhs and Christians. Support for ‘honour killings’ has thankfully fallen since 2006 when, in a similar survey of young Asians aged 16-34, 8% overall justified such killings, peaking at 14% among Hindus and Christians.

‘Izzat’, therefore, does not appear to be the preserve of any particular faith but seems to reflect the wider cultural inheritance of many young British Asians. Presumably, the same is likely to be true of older Asians, among whom the concept may be stronger, and perhaps endorsement of ‘honour killings’ slightly higher.

However, the ComRes poll strikingly illustrates that ‘izzat’ is not just a generational attitude, which will eventually die out as the older and less ‘westernized’ British Asian cohorts pass on. It is clearly a concept which has been successfully transmitted by their parents to young British Asians of all faiths, albeit in a somewhat attenuated form.

The Crown Prosecution Service is quoted as saying that there are between 10 and 12 honour killings a year in this country. A recent analysis of police force statistics identified over 2,800 honour crimes annually, but experts suspect this to be a significant underestimate.

 

 


British Religion in Numbers: All the material published on this website is subject to copyright. We explain further here.

This entry was posted in Religion and Ethnicity, Religion in public debate, Survey news and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Honour Crimes

  1. Pingback: A few good links | eChurch Blog

  2. Pingback: Daily Mail ‘Honour Violence’ Headline Smears Young British Muslims | David L Rattigan

  3. Pingback: Honor Killings - Page 7 - Religious Education Forum

  4. Pingback: Islamic parents murder daughter due to 'shame on the family' - Page 6

  5. Pingback: Pakistan-born parents guilty of murdering ‘westernised’ British daughter - Page 2

  6. Pingback: Christianity in Britain Losing Ground to Islam, Secularism - Page 7 - Christian Forums

  7. Pingback: Your problem with Islam. - Page 14 - Christian Forums

  8. Sam says:

    This is an old post I know, but I have to wonder at why the poll was only confined to South Asians and why only in the concept of a narrowly defined criteria as if concept of Honor crimes or there equivalent do not exist in other communities.

    Also the summation that “Izzat’, therefore, does not appear to be the preserve of any particular faith but seems to reflect the wider cultural inheritance of many young British Asians. ”

    Based on this poll perhaps, but what of reality? Who has actually committed such crimes? The actual evidence from suspected Honor Killings suggests it is faith biased although it is other factors may contribute.

    I personally have not ever heard of Izzat, I person who would fall under this gross ethnic catagorisation of “Asian” depicted in the article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.