Inside the English Defence League

The English Defence League (EDL), founded in Luton in 2009, is widely considered to be the biggest populist street movement in a generation, with an active ‘membership’ of at least 25,000 to 35,000. Its official statements and literature suggest that its driving ideology is to confront radical Islam, yet this does not appear to be the primary concern of its supporters, according to a report published by the think-tank Demos on 30 October 2011. Written by Jamie Bartlett and Mark Littler, Inside the EDL: Populist Politics in a Digital Age is available to download at:

http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Inside_the_edl_WEB.pdf?1320079341

With the support of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Demos carried out an online survey of 1,295 EDL sympathizers and supporters aged 16 and over recruited from the EDL’s Facebook community between 5 and 11 May and 5 and 19 September 2011. Given that the EDL has no formal joining procedures or membership list, this was the only practicable option, but polling via social media sites can be problematic, not least because of the risk of ‘trolls’. These challenges are fully recognized by the authors, who contribute an important chapter (pp. 35-41) on methodology, which is well worth reading in its own right, for generic lessons which can be learned.

Asked to identify the two main issues facing the country, immigration headed the list with 42%, followed by radical Islam (31%), lack of jobs (26%), terrorism (19%), and the financial crisis (14%). On the other hand, 41% of supporters claimed to have joined the EDL because of their opposition to Islam (45% of men and 28% of women), and 31% gave reasons relating to the preservation of national values (which, for some, may also have carried an implication that such values were under threat from Islam). 

Beyond this anti-Islamism element, religion was not a strong focus for EDL supporters. Although 45% professed to be Christians, only 7% cited religion as an important personal value for them, way behind the most highly-rated values of security (36%), strong government (34%), rule of law (30%), individual freedom (26%), and respect for human life (25%). Moreover, 77% said that they tended not to trust religious institutions, a far cry from the 83% who trusted the army.


British Religion in Numbers: All the material published on this website is subject to copyright. We explain further here.

This entry was posted in Religion and Politics, Survey news and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Inside the English Defence League

  1. Pingback: English Defense League (EDL): 45% professes to be Christians, 7% cite religion as important personal value. | eChurch Blog

  2. I should highlight that co-author Mark Littler is also one of our PhD students in the Institute for Social Change at Manchester, researching a thesis on religion and violence, and has provided interesting stats to us on BRIN over the past year. The Facebook sampling method is innovative: applied elsewhere, it would potentially help us learn a great deal about hard-to-reach groups, including religious minorities, and those who fail to respond to traditional surveys.

  3. Stuart says:

    Thanks for that info Siobhan. To be frank, I’m a fan of anybody that contributes to BRIN, because as you might be able to tell, I’m a rather big BRIN fan.

    I’ve never said this before, but a huge thank you for all the hard work you do here on this site, and I know that I can say that on behalf of my blog readers also.

  4. Benita Hewitt says:

    I second that Stuart. BRIN offers an invaluable service which I make great use of. It not only keeps us informed about relevant research but provides excellent, impartial commentary on the findings and issues raised. A big thanks from me too for all the hard work done by the BRIN team.

  5. Pingback: Far Right Britons | British Religion in Numbers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>