Scotland and the Pope

Pope Benedict XVI’s state and pastoral visit to Great Britain is almost upon us, and there remains much speculation in the national and international print, broadcast and online news media about the extent of opposition which he will encounter while he is in the country between 16 and 19 September.

However, according to an upbeat press release issued yesterday (29 August) by the Scottish Catholic Media Office (SCMO), whatever problems the Pope may face in England (he does not actually visit Wales), his time in Edinburgh and Glasgow on 16 September may be relatively trouble-free.

SCMO’s confidence derives from a poll which it commissioned from Opinion Research Business, among a representative sample of 1,007 Scots aged 18 and over interviewed on 7-9 June 2010, as well as from intelligence that the Protest the Pope campaign has abandoned plans for a big demonstration in Scotland.

The survey found that only 2% of Scots strongly objected to the papal visit with another 3% saying they objected. Six times as many (31%) claimed to be very or fairly favourable, which is about double the proportion who gave their current religion as Roman Catholic at the 2001 Scottish census. The remainder (63%) were neutral. So perhaps apathy rather than hostility is the main risk to the visit in Scotland.

Some commentators have suggested that the low level of opposition to the papal visit in Scotland is quite encouraging, considering the country’s history of sectarian strife. Tom Peterkin, Scottish Political Editor for Scotland on Sunday, took it as a sign in yesterday’s edition that ‘Scotland’s sectarian wounds appear to be healing’. However, he failed to note that fieldwork for SCMO’s survey was some three months ago, and a lot of water has passed under Catholic bridges since that time.

Two other religion-related questions were posed in the poll, presumably to be used in the cross-analysis of replies to the papal visit question. Unfortunately, the full data tabulations with breaks by these variables and standard demographics are not yet online.

The first of these additional questions was ‘Irrespective of whether you go to church, do you regard yourself as a Christian?’ In reply, 70% said yes, 5% more than gave their current religion as Christian in 2001. 26% did not consider themselves to be Christian and 2% affiliated to a non-Christian faith.

The second question concerned frequency of attendance at religious services, other than for rites of passage. 20% claimed to go once a week or more often, 26% once a month or more, 28% less often and 33% never. These figures seem improbably optimistic, even in relation to earlier opinion poll data and certainly compared with trends revealed by the Scottish church attendance censuses of 1984, 1994 and 2002. In 2002 11% of the Scottish population attended on census Sunday.

SCMO’s press release can be found at:

http://www.scmo.org/articles/poll-shows-opposition-to-the-papal-visit-evaporating.html

 

Posted in Survey news | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pope Benedict on the Back Foot

Pope Benedict XVI has just celebrated the fifth anniversary of his accession to office, but his position is coming increasingly under fire in the wake of mounting revelations about the Roman Catholic Church’s complicity in the clerical abuse of children in the past.

No overall public opinion rating of the Pope appears to have been undertaken in Great Britain since we last reported on the matter on this website (‘What do we think of the Pope?’, 26 February 2010).

However, YouGov has inserted a couple of pertinent questions in its online survey of a representative sample of 2,095 adults aged 18 and over between 12 and 14 April 2010. You will find the detailed results, broken down by gender, age, social grade and region, at:

http://today.yougov.co.uk/sites/today.yougov.co.uk/files/YG-Archives-Pope-12.04.pdf

The first question asked Britons whether it was right for the Pope (when a Cardinal in 1985) to resist the immediate defrocking of a Californian priest with a criminal record of sexually molesting children on the grounds that ‘the good of the universal Church’ had to be taken into account.

91% of respondents condemned the Pope for taking this position and argued for immediate defrocking of a priest under such circumstances. Only 3% considered ‘the good of the universal Church’ was a relevant factor, with 7% don’t knows.

The second question alluded to efforts by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, two prominent atheists, to get human rights lawyers to produce a legal case for charging the Pope, during the forthcoming papal visit to England and Scotland (16-19 September), over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the Church.

Just 15% of the sample favoured the Pope being granted immunity from prosecution while in Britain (11% because the Vatican is a state and 4% because the Pope is a religious leader).

79% (with no great differences by demographic sub-groups) contended that the Pope should not have legal immunity (11% because they do not consider the Vatican to be a state and 68% because, whether a state or not, nobody should be above the law). The don’t knows again amounted to 7%.

The 1982 papal visit to Britain by Pope John Paul II excited a fair bit of controversy, but this year’s visit by Pope Benedict XVI looks set to stir up even more hostility. Not only does the scandal of child abuse in the Church look set to run and run, but secularists and humanists are clearly on the offensive (see our post ‘Cyber warfare breaks out over the papal visit to Britain’, 15 March 2010), elements of the Church of England have been stung by the Pope’s surprise announcement of self-governing ordinariates for former Anglicans, while the ‘no popery’ tradition of British Protestantism is not entirely extinguished.

Posted in Survey news | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cyber Warfare Breaks Out Over the Papal Visit to Britain

As anticipated in our post of 26 February on ‘What do we think of the Pope?’, the planned papal visit to Great Britain in September is already causing controversy. The internet has become one of the battlegrounds for the expression of rival views.

The campaign opened with an online petition on the National Secular Society’s website to ‘Make the Pope pay’. It called on the Prime Minister to ask the Roman Catholic Church to bear the estimated £20 million cost of the visit, to avoid any fiscal burden falling on the taxpayer. This petition attracted over 25,000 signatories in three weeks.

The National Secular Society has now closed this petition and joined forces with a petition started on the No. 10 website by Peter Tatchell of OutRage! This is open until 2 October 2010 and has to date (15 March) been signed by 7,771 people.

The Tatchell petition calls upon the Prime Minister to disassociate the British Government from ‘the Pope’s intolerant views’ ahead of the papal visit. Especially condemned is the ‘Pope’s opposition to women’s reproductive rights, gay equality, embryonic stem cell research and the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV.’

This petition will be found at:

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ProtestthePope/

Supporters of the papal visit have now opened a counter-petition at:

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?PopeinUK

Roman Catholics are being encouraged to sign up to this. A letter in the Catholic Herald of 12 March urged its readers to sign the petition and to get their parish priests to mention it in their parochial newsletters. As of 15 March, there are 24,454 signatories, probably not all of whom are from the United Kingdom.

Short comments are also allowed on this pro-visit website, of which the following are specimen examples:

  • ‘I’m disgusted that we even have to do this to welcome a man of the Church into our Christian country. What is this country coming to?’
  • ‘I fully support the Pope’s visit to this country and consider any opposition to be bigoted and against the principles of democracy’
  • ‘If it were a Muslim prelate there would be no opposition – they wouldn’t dare!’
  • ‘In a multi-faith, multi-cultural democracy we should welcome the leaders of all faiths and be prepared to accept that not all of their views will accord with our own’
  • ‘The Pope is a head of state. His visit is a matter between the Vatican and the UK Governments and does not depend on “yes” or “no” campaign of UK citizens or residents’

Of course, while of illustrative value, none of this expression of opinion has any kind of statistical significance. Like phone-in polls run by the media, these online surveys of self-selecting respondents fall into the realm of what Sir Robert Worcester of Ipsos-MORI has labelled ‘voodoo polls’.

Hopefully, in time, we will get a more scientific measurement of British attitudes to the papal visit, much like the series of polls run by Gordon Heald of Gallup in 1982 when Pope John Paul II visited Britain. These may be traced through the British Religion in Numbers sources database.

Posted in Religion in public debate | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment