Religious Affiliation and Volunteering

Volunteering by Affiliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This post is just to flag up the release of the most recent Taking Part in England dataset, covering January-December 2010. This survey is sponsored by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport and asks an unusually large sample their leisure and cultural pursuits. It also asks questions about friendships, political participation, and volunteering.

Religion is captured in the Taking Part surveys by a religious affiliation question along the lines of the recent Census, and a question on whether the respondent currently practises that religion. I posted about the survey here last year: DCMS also provides an online analysis tool, NETQuest, for TP users.

DCMS has compiled a report on the 2010 dataset, as well as some useful crosstabulations and trend data using the complete set of datasets. I have just drawn up the graph above from their uploaded tables on volunteering available here. There are also reports and tables available on digital participation, and cycling and swimming proficiency.

Sadly, the questions on volunteering were not asked in 2009. It’s not clear whether there is any distinct trend over the past five years, but there is a significant difference in the volunteering activity between those reporting that they are Christian and those reporting no religion.

There are many possible reasons for this: older people are also more likely to say that they volunteer, which is also given in thestables, and we know that the older are more likely to report a religious affiliation: this may be the key driver.

Nevertheless, Robert Putnam and David Campbell’s American Grace found that in the US those who were religiously-active were more likely to volunteer in all fields apart from the arts. (See the volunteering category at the American Grace blog; there is also a lot of coverage of American Grace at their Social Capital blog.)

It may be that the situation is similar in the UK. There is a good deal of work to be done in this area, and a lot of data are available. The 2008 British Social Attitudes survey included three items on volunteering:

How many times, if any, did you volunteer in the past 12 months? By volunteering, we mean any unpaid work done to help people besides your family or friends or people you work with.

and

Could you tell me whether you have done any volunteer work for a religious group or place of worship in the past 12 months? any unpaid work done to help people besides your family or friends or people you work with.

Before that, the 1998 and 2008 surveys included questions on charitable, political and religious volunteering, which could be broken down by religious affiliation and frequency of attendance.

Volunteering is also covered extensively in the Citizenship Survey, with a report published here on volunteering and charitable giving using the data. This found that non-practising Christians; practising and non-practising Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs; those of ‘other’ religions who are non-practising, and those with no religion were less likely to volunteer regularly in a formal context compared to practising Christians.

Volunteering is also covered in the European Values Study and European Social Survey.

Substantial research programmes already exist to study volunteering, social capital and philanthropy. The task remains for researchers in the sociology of religion to explain the causal mechanisms through which religiosity affects voluntary effort, and to suggest what the impact of secularisation and growing religious diversity is likely to be.

Posted in Measuring religion, Religion and Social Capital | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Census Day

The census manages to evoke contrary responses: it’s either a bit of a joke or a threat to civil liberty. I’ll address the objections in a moment, but let’s start with the jolly part.

Religion makes an important contribution to census-related humour. Who can mention the subject without bringing up the 390,000 Jedi Knights enumerated in England and Wales in 2001? Not The Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/10/census-2011-do-we-need-it

The columnist Lucy Mangan wrestles with the problem of counting bedrooms, though she also notes that “The question about religion is voluntary, but precipitates an avalanche of self-interrogation nevertheless.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/mar/19/lucy-mangan-uk-census-politics

And the ‘alternative census’ available on the Guardian’s website offers some non-standard answers to the religion question:

What is your religion?
   Facebook
   Twitter
   The Wire
   Professor Brian Cox

We are gratified to see that, at the time of posting, our Manchester colleague Brian Cox is running neck-and-neck with Facebook (at about 34% each). To see whether Brian has pulled into the lead, you’ll have to complete the form:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/poll/2011/mar/25/alternative-census-2011-poll

And now to the objections. Will your details be left on a train? The Office for National Statistics goes to extraordinary lengths to safeguard confidentiality. The claims  – for example by the NO2ID campaign  – that data identifying individuals can legally be released to analysts in this country or any other are based on a misunderstanding of the relevant legislation. The EU directive being cited by objectors sets minimum standards; it allows but does not require data sharing. The law in this country mandates high levels of protection for census data.

The information collected is far less sensitive than that routinely stored on us by GPs, the Inland Revenue, banks, employers, telephone companies, credit card companies, and so on. There are richer pickings elsewhere for security services; cracking the census vault to learn whether we have central heating is an unlikely use of resources. The Muslim Council of Britain has urged Muslim households to complete their forms. If Muslims, who have more reason than most to be paranoid, are keen to be included, why not the rest of us?

Credit details, medical records and so on are inherently sensitive because they are linked to you specifically. The census isn’t like that; no records on named individuals are used. We don’t want to know the religion or non-religion or Mr Smith or Ms Patel; we’d just like to know how many people in each local area have which characteristics and need which services.

For these purposes, the sad truth is that no one cares who you are. Names and addresses are stripped off as soon as the data are processed. Some of our colleagues in the Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research spend their working lives ensuring that no identifying information is released, and it is understandably frustrating to them when objectors act like American ‘Tea Party’ activists who think that the government is conspiring against them.

If this census is the last, it will have to be replaced by something. The government has talked vaguely about linking public and commercial datasets. Leaving aside the feasibility of such an exercise, it would pose far greater risks to confidentiality than the tightly controlled census of population. Anti-census agitation seems misguided.

The census helps to guide the allocation of billions of pounds of our money. Recording your existence is a minimal form of social responsibility. Avoiding it has real consequences: public services in some areas suffered because of undercounts in 2001.

Apologies for the sermon – can Brian Cox absolve me?

Posted in Measuring religion, Official data, Religion in public debate, Religion in the Press | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Value Orientation of Contemporary Pagans

Many new religious movements have emerged since the mid-twentieth century and Paganism is an important strand. This emergence coincided with the emergence and growth of post-materialist attitudes. As a sociologist of religion based at the University of Tampere with particular interests in Paganism, I am following this weekend’s Census with great interest, particularly the campaign of the Pagan Federation for those following one of the Pagan pathways to use the ‘write in’ section to write ‘Pagan’ or ‘Pagan-Heathen’, ‘Pagan-Wicca’ et cetera, rather than leaving their religion not stated. In the 2001 Census, 42,000 of the population in Great Britain used the write-in section in this way, although many considered that this was a substantial undercount.

Statistics on Pagans are relatively limited and conventional surveys do not capture them in sufficient numbers for further analysis. Even where sample sizes are large, Pagans are not coded separately and so we do not know which of the ‘Other Religion’ group are Pagan.

For my PhD project, I therefore used a non-probability sampling method to learn more about the values of Pagans compared to the mainstream UK population. I gathered data from 451 Pagans from the UK, Ireland, and Finland, and 130 Open University students with a similar age and gender profile to serve as a proxy for the mainstream UK population. The fieldwork was conducted over eight months from September 2007 to April 2008. I used a 21-item questionnaire measuring values, and a 32-item individualism–collectivism questionnaire.

For the Pagan sample, respondents were asked to indicate their spiritual path from a list of options: Wicca or Witchcraft, Druidic, Heathen, Shamanic, Eco-Pagan, Pagan, Reconstructionist, or Goddess Spirituality. They were also given the option of further elaboration.

My main findings were that Pagans have significantly higher emphasis than the mainstream group on post-materialist values, scoring high on Universalism and Self-direction and low on Security and Conformity. Within the Pagan group, I found that the majority share a world-view, with nearly three-quarters (72%) seeing themselves as independent and interconnected, with high tolerance of difference and for whom competition and in-group duty are not salient. A second sub-group (12%) is less independent and more interconnected; a third (7%) more in-group focussed and less competitive and tolerant; and a fourth group (10%) is relatively competitive, more individualist and with a lower tolerance of difference. The table and chart below provide more detail on how the sub-groups compare.

Location of Pagan Sub-Group Values Compared To Mainstream Sub-Groups

I did not find a significant difference between the sub-groups in terms of gender or birth cohort distribution, although the interconnected Pagans were older and the competitive Pagan sub-group had a more equal gender division. Neither were there any significant differences between the Pagan sub-groups in country or Pagan path distribution.

My overall conclusions were that the value priorities of the majority of Pagans can be considered to be postmaterialist, emphasising universalistic values and self-direction. I also found that while there was a wide variety of self-identifications given by those who took part in the Pagan survey, there was relative similarity across the sample in its value orientation. It appears that the high tolerance of difference can be partly attributed to this plurality of spiritual paths. A detailed paper covering the research and with more extensive discussion is available here.

I am continuing my research into contemporary Paganism among other subjects and my next plans are to further explore the linkages between different religious and secular worldviews and people’s values. For more information, see my Academia.edu profile or contact me at mika @ lassander. net

Posted in Measuring religion, Other | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Religious Affiliation by Birth Decade

Religious Affiliation in England by Five-Year Birth Period

Religious Affiliation in Scotland by Birth Decade

Affiliation in Wales by Birth Decade

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My former colleague Rod Ling did some excellent work creating a single data file integrating the religion questions from all of the British Social Attitudes surveys from 1983 to 2008. Looking at the pooled sample, I wanted to see how religious affiliation varies by birth decade in England, Scotland and Wales, and how the affiliation of younger birth cohorts compares with that of older birth cohorts.

My concern was that there would not be a big enough sample size for the oldest cohort (born 1900-1910) and the youngest (born in the 1980s) to break them down reliably by broad religious affiliation (Anglican, Roman Catholic, Non-denominational Christian, Free Churches, Other Christian, Other Religion and No Religion). For that reason I have looked at percentage affiliated by birth decade for Scotland and Wales (where sample sizes are smaller) and percentage affiliated by five-year birth period for England.

The patterns are interesting – we can see that an increasing proportion of the younger birth cohorts are ‘none’, other religion or non-denominational Christian. In some cases non-denominational Christian describes those who are members of independent churches; in other cases those who identify as ‘Christian’ as a cultural or ethnic marker without affiliating to any particular group or institution.

Among those born between 1900 and 1909 in the combined English samples, 55% identify as Anglican and 16% as ‘no religion’. By comparison, among those born between 1980 and 1989 in the combined English samples collected over the course of the BSA surveys, 9% identify as Anglican and 58% identify as ‘no religion’. For the combined Scottish samples from the 1983-2008 surveys, among those born between 1900 and 1909, 56% identify as Church of Scotland and 16% as ‘no religion’. Among those born between 1980 and 1989, 12% identify as Church of Scotland and 63% as ‘no religion’. Overall, it appears that the increase in ‘nones’ among younger birth cohorts is largely at the expense of the established churches.

While the charts are beguiling, be aware that the x-axis points are period categories rather than indicating a continuum: properly, the changes in proportions should be shown in steps (as illustrated below), rather than a trend existing between 1970-1979 and 1980-1989. But overall I think it’s fair enough to illustrate composition change between cohorts in this way (because the differences in the bars are not easy to read); please comment below if you think not!

Religious Affiliation in Scotland - Bar Area Chart

Posted in Measuring religion, visualisation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Places of Worship in England and Wales, 1999-2009

PoW-area-chart

Registered Places of Worship by Faith Community, England and Wales, 1999-2009 (1999=100)

We have spent a little time compiling data on registered places of worship in England and Wales from 1999-2009 and are making a note here on the data, and the caveats you need to bear in mind before interpreting them.

The official data have been incorporated into three spreadsheets by Mark Littler, a young researcher at the University of Manchester with interests in religion and extremism, experimental methods and quantitative approaches more broadly. We have posted the spreadsheets here, including regional breakdowns.

The headline data suggest that ‘mainline’ established denominations are showing a reduction over time in numbers of places of worship, while other world religions, ‘other Christians’, and ‘other’ faith communities are exhibiting a gradual increase.

Note that the data do not cover the Church of England or Church in Wales, which are not required to register.

Taken at face value, these trends fit with a story of secularisation leading to a net reduction in longer-established Christian churches, together with increased ethnic and religious diversity leading to a growth in the number of places of worship for Christian communities outside the traditional categories (‘other Christian’) as well as other world religions and new religious movements, notably Muslim, Sikh and ‘other’.

The line graph above illustrates, using an index where 1999 is the base year (1999=100 for each faith community). By 2009, the figure for Catholics is 98.5, Methodists 94.2, Congregationalists 98.6, URC 93.3, Calvinistic Methodists 97.4, Brethren 99.6, Salvation Army 94.7, Unitarians 97.8, Society of Friends (Quakers) 99.7, Jehovah’s Witnesses 101.2, Other Christians 107.1, Jews 104.5, Muslims 146.5, Sikhs 118.9 and Others 131.7.

The lines for each group are not easy to see so the chart legend additionally ranks the denominations by net growth/loss in numbers in 2009 compared with 1999. The regional data are also of interest: in London, church numbers for ‘Other Christians’ increased by 16% over the 1999-2009 period, while numbers of mosques increased by 42% and ‘other’ places of worship by 91%.

However, these data can’t be used on their own as an indicator of community growth and decline, for a number of reasons. First, not all places of worship are registered, and not all redundant properties are de-registered. In some cases, a denomination may have a ‘clear out’ both in terms of adjusting their property portfolio and with regard to the Register. Secondly, the numbers do not adjust for capacity, so that where (for example) a church is sold or demolished to build a larger church, no net gain is shown in the numbers. A faith group which consolidates its properties – for example, following suburbanisation of its adherents – will show up as declining using numbers of places of worship as the sole indicator of vitality.

Thirdly, communal worship is not central to some belief systems, or worship may not primarily take place in public places of worship. Pagans, for example, do not have any public places of worship in the traditional sense, practising privately whether in- or outdoors, while moots are organised in cafes and pubs.

History of Registration
The registration of places of worship has an interesting history, covered in detail by Clive Field elsewhere on this site (see page 3 of this report, or click here).

In 1689, nonconformists were required to register their meeting houses with the authorities in England and Wales – an obligation which never extended to Scotland. The process also conferred legal (and later, taxation) advantages, so organisations preferred to register even when the obligation to do so lessened after the Places of Worship Registration Act 1855.

Before the mid-nineteenth century licences were issued by county and borough quarter sessions, or episcopal and archidiaconal registries, but the Protestant Dissenters Act 1852 transferred the responsibility to the Registrar General – and the General Register Office still holds this responsibility.

Lists and tables of these registrations have been published occasionally as House of Commons Parliamentary Papers before the First World War (for instance, 1882,Vol. 50); or later (intermittently) in The Official List, Part III and Marriage and Divorce Statistics, in a series currently published by National Statistics as FM2 Table 3.42. Buildings registered for the solemnisation of marriages are identified separately as FM2 Table 3.43. Data for selected years from 1972 have been assembled in the various editions of P. Weller (ed.), Religions in the UK.

Why and How Places Register
Places of worship which have been registered officially are generally exempted from local business rates. Schedule 5 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 provides that the places of worship are exempted if they are Church of England or Church in Wales, or ‘any other recognised religion… and the premises must be used and available for public religious worship’. Church halls and administrative offices also qualify if required for the place of worship to operate. While being officially-registered does not prove that a building is a place of worship, registration is an additional piece of evidence that the property is actively used as a place of worship. It seems likely that non-registered places of worship usually manage to win exemption also, although I haven’t been able to find information about this.

Religious organisations are asked to fill in Form 76, provide a plan or sketch of the building identifying the spaces used for worship, and a timetable of when the building will be used. These are sent to the Superintendant General. The form provides that the faith group name is given in the space after the following: ‘XXXX will accordingly be forthwith used as a place of meeting for religious worship by a congregation or assembly of persons calling themselves XXXX’. Hence it is very simple and non-prescriptive with regard to identifying names.

A Freedom of Information Request made in March 2010 led to a complete list of the extant Register being published online, illustrating the issues at hand. For example, there is one place of worship listed as “Quaker”, 41 as “Quakers”, 314 as “Friends”, and 9 as “Society of Friends”. Most mosques are described as attended by “Muslims” but in some cases “Sunni Muslims” or “Shia” are specified. There are a number of mis-spellings; it is not clear when places of worship were added to the database; and addresses are not entered consistently (many specify the part of the building which is used as a place of worship – e.g. “two rooms on second floor” rather than the postal address).

I am gradually cleaning the file published online to categorise denominations and hope eventually to provide a comprehensible list by local authority.

The form does advise that ‘the description “Christians not otherwise designated” may be used. If the worshippers decline to describe themselves by any distinctive appellation, the words “calling themselves” may be erased and the words “who object to be designated by any distinctive religious appellation” inserted’. Accordingly, of the 29372 listed in March 2010, 1517 identify as Christians not otherwise designated and 53 churches “who object…”. Offering a list of standardised terms would help categorise the raw data and draw further information on the nature of the congregation.

Under- and Over-Registration
What is clear is that not all places of worship register – and equally, places of worship which are sold to residential property developers are not required to be de-registered. A casual check of the March 2010 threw up examples of churches which were for sale, and a number of organisations which may well have ceased to exist. Mehmood Naqshbandi at the excellent Muslims in Britain site and online directory has been running a project for several years to identify every active mosque (masjid) in England and Wales, and has reached a count of 1595 mosques – some way above the officially-registered total of 870.

He suggests that perhaps as many as 20% of the entries for mosques in the official Register are for mosques which no longer exist, while the running total does not capture about half of the actual Muslim places of worship. In some cases, this may be because they are prayer rooms within universities or similar, or exist as facilities within larger community and cultural centres, and therefore there is no financial benefit in registering.

He notes,
‘There is negligible benefit in registering, it being ‘permissive’ since 1852. The process dates to a time when religious dissenters were excluded from many aspects of civil life. Furthermore, the Register is massively out of date, largely from neglecting to de-register congregations’ places of worship that have moved or disbanded. The state-established churches of Britain, e.g. Church of England churches, are exempt from registration, so would add considerably to the 40,000 listed…’.

He is currently working through his own files and the Register to categorise mosques in Britain in as much detail as possible: by administrative boundary, religious tradition, size, location and so forth. The project also aims to uncover where under- or over-registration is most prevalent. The most recent summary of his data is available here.

We will write more in due course on Naqshbandi’s fascinating data later, but provide the link to interested readers now.

Note that the 2008 and 2009 data have been made available to us ahead of National Statistics’ publication schedule (current data online for the FM2 series are only available up to 2007) following a Freedom of Information request. Thanks to National Statistics for providing data early, and to David Buckley and Selwyn Hughes at the General Register Office for enabling the data release.

Posted in Measuring religion, Official data, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Census Question Under Fire

There are just six days to go before UK residents have to complete the household and individual questionnaire for the decennial population census.

But humanists are still simultaneously maintaining their attack on the voluntary question on religion while paradoxically encouraging people to answer it, ideally (from the humanist perspective) by registering as of no religion.

In a press release on 20 March the British Humanist Association (BHA) described the census question as ‘highly misleading’ and ‘fatally flawed for its intended purpose of planning public services’. The BHA’s evidence for this claim comes from new opinion polls conducted online by YouGov in England and Wales and in Scotland.

The English and Welsh survey, commissioned by the BHA, was undertaken on 9-11 March 2011 among a representative sample of 1,896 adults aged 18 and over. The Scottish poll was sponsored by the Humanist Society of Scotland and conducted on 10-14 January 2011 among 2,007 adults.

In England and Wales, when asked the census question ‘What is your religion?’, 61% ticked a religious box and 39% declared themselves to be of no religion. However, when asked ‘Are you religious?’, just 29% said ‘yes’ and 65% ‘no’, ‘meaning over half of those whom the census would count as having a religion said they were not religious’.

Responses varied somewhat according to demographics, most notably by age. Whereas 56% of 18-24s had no religion, the proportion fell steadily throughout the age cohorts, to stand at 25% among the over-55s. Similarly, while 70-73% of the three under-45 cohorts stated that they were not religious, this was the case with 68% of those aged 45-54 and 56% of the over-55s.

Marital status also appeared to make a difference, although this pattern doubtless conceals an age-related effect. The number professing no religion was highest among the never married (53%) and those living as married (52%). It was substantially lower among those who were currently married or in a civil partnership (31%) or had formerly been, 27% among the separated or divorced and 25% with the widowed.

The 53% of the English and Welsh sample who professed to be Christian were additionally asked: ‘Do you believe that Jesus Christ was a real person who died and came back to life and was the son of God?’ Fewer than half (48%) said that they did so believe, with 27% disbelieving and 25% unsure, BHA’s unspoken point presumably being that many so-called Christians have rather a shallow or unconventional faith.

It is also a generally inactive faith, in terms of attendance at a place of worship for religious reasons. Only 15% of the entire sample claimed to have been within the past month, with a further 16% going within the past year, 43% more than a year ago and 20% never. The never category was largest among the 18-24s (28%), with 32% for full-time students.

In Scotland, one-half of the sample was asked the Scottish census question: ‘What religion, religious denomination or body do you belong to?’ In reply, 56% of Scots professed some affiliation (with write-in responses available) and 42% none.

The other Scottish half-sample was initially asked: ‘Are you religious?’ 35% said that they were and 56% that they were not, with 8% uncertain. Those who answered that they were religious or who did not know were then asked: ‘Which religion do you belong to?’ At this point, 22% said that they did not belong to any organized religion.

The BHA press release and links to the data tables for both England and Wales and Scotland will be found at:

http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/771

These statistics serve to illustrate what is already generally well-known, that surveys on religious (and – indeed – all other) topics are inevitably informed or perhaps even shaped by question-wording.

The Office for National Statistics, which is overseeing the census, is fully aware of the sensitivities and ambiguities of investigating religion. It has gone to some considerable lengths to research and trial the merits of alternative wordings during its census preparations.

For fuller information about these deliberations and experimentation, see the October 2009 ONS report on Final Recommended Questions for the 2011 Census in England and Wales: Religion, which is available on the ONS website.

Posted in church attendance, Measuring religion, News from religious organisations, Official data, Survey news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Other – Write In”

by Siobhan McAndrew and Ben Clements.

 

Wordle for written-in text

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The British Election Study 2009-2010 is a valuable resource for political scientists. What researchers in religion may not realise is that the questions on religious affiliation can tell us something about how people define themselves, and to a certain extent, about the comparative size of new religious movements, sects, and smaller religions. The Internet Panel sample comprised 16816 respondents giving more ability than in smaller surveys to look at smaller faith communities.

Large government-sponsored surveys tend to offer limited options when asking religious affiliation. For example, the Integrated Household Survey does not distinguish between different denominations of Christianity. For both the IHS and the Census, it is thought that many respondents identify themselves as Christian because they want to distinguish themselves from other religious and ethnic identities, even though they may never attend church or think of themselves as belonging to a particular congregation or denomination. The British Social Attitudes survey does ask people about their denomination, after screening out those who say they do not belong to a religion. However the sample size tends to be too small to capture smaller communities in sufficient detail for further analysis. Even the Baptists, a historic Christian denomination, only fielded 33 of 4486 respondents in 2008.

In addition, BSA respondents are categorised in ways which are designed to be consistent over time. However, the categories of ‘Christian – Non-Denominational’ and ‘Other Religion’ obscure the diversity which seems likely to exist within these groups. The non-denominational Christian group is likely to be a blend of cultural or nominal Christians as well as members of independent, non-denominational Churches. In the English Church Census, these were described as ‘New Churches’. Some of these may self-define as evangelical, and others not; either way, the religiosity of the ‘new church’ Christians is likely to be very different to that of the nominal Christians, who a generation earlier may have defined as Anglican.

The 2001 Census offered an opportunity to investigate the smaller communities in more depth, but a question on denomination along the lines of the Northern Ireland census was rejected. In Scotland, people were asked if they were Church of Scotland, Roman Catholic or ‘other Christian’, which allowed finer detail. Nevertheless, many Census respondents took the opportunity to ‘write in’ their responses. The denominational codes used in Northern Ireland were adapted and the written in responses aggregated as illustrated in the following Census table (see worksheet 5).

One issue was that a sizeable proportion misunderstood or did not follow the response options as specified, so that some wrote in that they were Catholic, Methodist, etc., as if these were other than Christian. The tendency to write in a response probably varied across smaller religions too: some groups mobilised their adherents to write in a particular response whereas others did not.

This brings us on to the written-in section of the BES, specifically the Internet Panel sample. Like the BSA, a screening question is asked first.

Do you regard yourself as belonging to any particular religion?

1. Yes; 2. No; 3. Not sure/Don’t know

Which religion or denomination?
1. Church of England/Anglican/Episcopal; 2. Roman Catholic; 3. Presbyterian/Church of Scotland; 4. Methodist; 5. Baptist; 6. United Reformed Church; 7. Free Presbyterian; 8. Brethren; 9. Jewish; 10. Hindu; 11. Islam/Muslim; 12. Sikh; 13. Buddhist; 14. Other.

Faith community Unweighted base % weighted sample
Anglican 4227 24.5
Roman Catholic 1326 7.7
Presbyterian 441 2.3
Methodist 375 2.1
Baptist 245 1.4
United Reformed Church 81 0.4
Brethren 18 0.1
Free Presbyterian 16 0.1
Jewish 165 0.9
Hindu 62 0.4
Muslim 110 0.8
Sikh 14 0.1
Buddhist 46 0.2
Other 525 3.0
Total adherents 7651 44.0
No religion 9165 56.0
Total 16816 100.0

Note that the table above gives the unweighted number of respondents in the sample which selected each faith community category in the middle column. However, the percentage figures have had a sample weight (W8_F) applied to the entire group of respondents contacted for the survey before the 2010 electoral campaign. (Weights are used to adjust survey samples for differing probabilities of being selected, for differential non-response among different demographic groups, and to adjust the sampled distribution for key variables such as sex, age, and ethnicity to conform to a known population distribution. Otherwise, estimates of the prevalence of different groups in the population are potentially misleading.)

For the 525 choosing “other”:
You said you belong to an ‘other’ religion or denomination. Please say what this is [written into open text box].

This allowed people to clarify their religious identity. We categorised the responses into the following categories:

Faith community Unweighted base Weighted % of all “Religion – Other”
Non-denominational Christian 125 20.05
Pagans 66 12.36
Spiritualist 38 7.56
Evangelical Christian 35 7.32
Pentecostalist 38 7.30
Salvation Army 22 7.17
Latter-Day Saints/Mormon 29 6.11
Won’t say 20 3.75
Christian Other (free churches, Lutheran, Church of Sweden etc) 20 3.59
Unreligious inc. Jedi 15 3.44
Jehovah’s Witness 13 2.57
Society of Friends/Quaker 15 2.51
Other 10 2.44
Orthodox (unspecified) 12 2.07
Greek Orthodox 9 2.06
Other World Religion 8 1.72
Other New Religious Movements 11 1.65
Welsh Congregationalist/Independent 8 1.18
Humanist/Free Thinker 5 1.02
Presbyterian/Church of Scotland 4 0.75
Anglican 5 0.75
Unitarian 5 0.73
Christian Related (Christian Science, Christadelphian) 4 0.71
Mixed (e.g. “Buddhist Christian”) 3 0.59
Seventh-Day Adventist 3 0.42
“Spiritual generally” 2 0.32
Total 525 100.00

We could write at length about the ‘Other’ group, but here are some key points. First, 3% looks small, but compares with 0.28% identifying as ‘other’ in Great Britain in the 2001 Census. This may be because the ‘other’ group here includes non-mainline Christians whereas the ‘other’ group in the Census was designed to capture members of other non-Christian religions specifically (religions apart from Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Islam, and Judaism).

Secondly, some respondents appear to have simply made mistakes (e.g. those identifying as Anglican), partly perhaps because the online form doesn’t allow a return to previous screens. Occasionally, however, people want to clarify that their affiliation is complex, for example because they do not practise or believe a certain aspect of the faith.

Thirdly, it’s interesting to note that the majority of those identifying with what we have categorised as new religious movements are Pagan, rather than following more esoteric or recently-established movements (there were only two Scientologists among the respondents, for example). The Pagan Federation has been active in campaigning for those following the various “Pagan pathways” as “Pagan” in official and other surveys. Looking at the unweighted bases and the weighted percentages, Pagans (66 respondents, 0.36% of weighted sample) appears to be about as prevalent as Buddhists (46, 0.24%) – although of course these are very small numbers and percentages, and a degree of sampling error is likely.

Fourthly, it is interesting to note how many Christians exist outside the traditional Anglican, Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, Methodist, URC, Baptist and Brethren categories. 35 respondents identified themselves as “evangelical” and 125 as non-denominational Christians (using a variety of appellations). While consistency of categorisation is obviously helpful when comparing groups over time, there may be a need to re-categorise when some groups are vanishingly small and newer identities are growing but simply grouped as “Christian-Other”.

A final point is that a number of the written-in responses have involved people choosing from different philosophies in highly individual ways; in some cases the space to type in a response allows a modicum of self-expression. Examples include:

– A respondent identifying as Mexica – perhaps as a member of the Nahuatl/Mexica, and perhaps following indigenous religion in the form of “modern Nahuaism”. After some thought, we categorised this as a New Religious Movement analogous to Paganism.
– A respondent who identifies as a member of the “Oreder of the Jedi”.
– A Discordian respondent.
– A respondent who typed, ‘Lapsed Anglican (they don’t want me!)’.
– A respondent who identifies with ‘Spititualism ( This is a government recognised religion, so can you tell me why it is not included on your list of Religions please, ) Thank you !!’.
– A respondent who wrote, ‘every night i pray to Jesus, Mary and God but dont read the bible or go to church’.
– And members of the national British philosophy ‘Mind your own business’, also written in as ‘none of your business’, ‘not going to divulge’, ‘nothing to do with any body but me’, and ‘private’.

The set of written-in answers is given in full below, in alphabetical order. They have also been used to create the Wordle at the head of this post (where more than one respondent wrote in the same affiliation, we repeated the text pro rata). The BES dataset lists exactly what was typed, so that different spellings (and capitalisations) are listed and aggregated separately.

Siobhan McAndrew
Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester
siobhan.mcandrew @ manchester.ac.uk

Ben Clements
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester
bc101 @ leicester.ac.uk

. [a full-stop – we categorised this as “won’t say”]
“DIY” religion (having an Inner Faith but being ritual-averse and regimentation-averse) – a Quaker/Shaker/Goddess-Centred/Christ’s Teachings Follower.
Abstain
aetheist
aethist
Anarchist
annibynwr
annibynwyr
AOG (Pentecostal)
Asatru
Assemblies of God
Bahai
Born again
Born again christian
Born again Christian
Born Again Christian
Brahma Kumaris
Buddhist christian
celtic pagan
Celtic Pagan
charasmatic christian
Charismatic Christian – New Frontiers
Christadelphian
Christian- Evangelical, Charismatic
Christian – Global Worship Centre
christian – no denomination
Christian – no denomination
Christian – non denominational
Christian – Salvation Army
Christian – you have given denominations, not religions
christian
Christian
CHRISTIAN
Christian (ie no strong perference for any denomination)
Christian (no denomination)
Christian (non-denominational)
Christian (non denominational)
Christian /Lutheran
Christian although I worship in C of E
christian buddhist
Christian but no particular denomination
christian but no specific denomination
Christian evangelical
Christian evangelical / free church
Christian faith not religion
christian fellowship
Christian Free Church
Christian Jehovah’s Witness
christian new frontiers
christian non-denomination
Christian non-denominational
Christian Non-Denominational
Christian not of a denomination
Christian Orthodox
Christian Other
Christian Science
christian scientist
christian spiritualist
Christian spiritualist
Christian Spiritualist
Christian, no denomination
christian, other denomination
christian, unbaptised Jehovahs witness
Christian, without denomination
Christian,no denomination
Christian/Buddist
CHRISTIANITY
Christianity but no specific denomination
christion
church in wales
Church in Wales
Church of Christ
Church of CHrist
Church of England
Church of God
Church of God the Creator
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)
cHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
Church of Jesus Christ of latter day saints
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Church of Scotland
CHURCH OF SCOTLAND
Church of Sweden
Church of Wales
Church Of Wales
congregational
Congregational
coptic orthodox
Deist
Discordian
dk
do not wish to
Druid
Druid (Pagan)
Elim Pentecostal Church
evangelical
Evangelical
Evangelical born again Christian
evangelical christian
Evangelical christian
Evangelical Christian
Evangelical Free Church
Evangelical/ Pentecostal movement
evangelistic
evangical christan
evengelic
Every Nation Church
every night i pray to Jesus, Mary and God but dont read the bible or go to church
Faith – I believe in God’s Word
Fountain of Life
free christian
Free Christian
free church
free church, evangelical
free evangelical
free thinker
Fundamental Christian
general non-conformist christian
Greek Orthadox
greek orthodox
Greek Orthodox
GREEK ORTHODOX
greek orthodox Christian
Ground Level
Heathen
Hillsong My Church
House Church (Christian Charismatic)
humanist
humanist spiritualist
I am a spiritualist
I consider myself a Christian, no denomination
Independant church
Independant Evangelical Church
Independent Evangelical
Independent Evangelical Christian
Isian
jain
Jain (7th Religion in the World)
jainism
jedi
Jedi
JEDI
Jediism
jehovah’s witness
Jehovah’s Witness
jehovahs witness
Jehovahs Witness
Jehovahs Wittness
Just Christian
jw
JW
Kirati
Lapsed Anglican (they don’t want me!)
Latter-Day Saint
Latter Day Saint
LDS
Lutheran
Lutherian Evangelical
m,.knm
Mexica
Mind your own business
mormon
Mormon
my own personal interpretation of Christianity
n
n/a
N/A
na
natural
new testment christian
NO
No denomination identify as Christian
Non- denominational Christian
Non-conformist Christian
Non-denomination, Christian.
Non-denominational Christian
Non Conformist
nondenominational christian
none
none of your business
not applicable
not going to divulge
Not organised
not relevent
nothing to do with any body but me
Odinism
Odinist
Oreder of the Jedi
orthodox
Orthodox
Orthodox Christian
other christian
Other Chrsitian
Pagan – specifically wiccan & goddess
pagan
Pagan
Pagan Wiccan
Pagan, Wiccan
Pagan/wiccan
paganism
Paganism
pagen
Parsi Zorastrian
Pentacostal
Pentcostal
PENTECOASTAL
pentecost
pentecostal
Pentecostal
Pentecostal ( elim)
pentecostal christian
Pentecostal/Evengelical
penticostal
Penticostal
Penticostal Christianity
penticostian
Polytheistic Pantheonist
Prefer not to
prefer not to say
private
Protestant
Protestant Lutheran
Protestant non-conformist
Quaker – Religious Society of Friends
quaker
Quaker
quakers
red indian
Religious Society of Friends
Religious Society of Friends (Quarkers)
Religious Society of Friends, otherwise known as the Quakers
Russian orthodox
Russian Orthodox
salvation army
sALVATION ARMY
Salvation Army
Sanatan Dharma
scientology
Scientology
Seventh-Day Adventist
seventh day adventist
Seventh Day Adventist
shamanistic pagan
spiritallist
spiritaul
Spiritual
SPIRITUAL CHURCH
spiritualiist
spiritualism
Spiritualism
spiritualist
Spiritualist
SPIRITUALIST
spirituliat
spiritulist
Spiritulist
Spititualism ( This is a government recognised religion, so can you tell me why it is not included on your list of Religions please, ) Thank you !!
Survivalist/Spiritualist
Taoism
The Church of Christ of Latterday Saints
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day saints (Mormon)
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day saints. (Mormon).
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints
The church of Jesus christ of lattterday saints. Christian (Mormon)
The Church of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)
The Salvation Army
The teachings of Christ
Theism
theist
Thelemite
Tradi Polytheist
True Christian
unitarian
Unitarian
Unitarian – Christian
Uniterian
Welsh Congregational
Welsh Congrigational
WELSH INDEPENDANT
Welsh Independent Church
Welsh Independent Non-Conformist
Welsh Nonconformist
wicca
Wicca
wiccan
Wiccan
Wiccan/Pagan
Zoroastrian

Posted in Measuring religion, Research note | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Ethnic Minority British Election Study (EMBES) – Part II

This second BRIN post reports reports various attitudes and behaviour for the May 2010 General Election by religious affiliation in a series of cross-tabulations, again using the EMBES survey.

Please note that for the tables using the religion categories, percentages sum down each column (except for Table 4a, which sums across the rows). The original religious affiliation variable on the EMBES dataset has been slightly modified. The ‘Other’ category used here combines one Jewish respondent, Buddhists (3 cases), and Other Religion (26 cases). The measures of attitudes and behaviour are the same as those looked at by ethnic group in my previous post.

To reiterate, Tables 1-5 report the weighted percentages and the unweighted number of cases. As before, the figures in this column should be kept in mind when using the percentages reported here as some categories may consist of only a small number of cases.

Table 6 reports the (weighted) mean scores for likeability ratings of the political parties. Respondents were asked to give a 0 to 10 scale by the EMBES questionnaire, where a score of 0 represents the lowest likeability, and a score of 10 would indicate the highest likeability. In the EMBES dataset, the scale ranges from 1 to 11 – so that a score of 1 represents the worst evaluation possible, and a score of 11 the highest.

Note that there are also two subsidiary tables based on follow-up questions to the religious affiliation item in the EMBES survey, which accompany Table 4. Table 4a shows vote choice in the 2010 general election by Christian tradition or denomination, while Table 4b reports vote choice in the 2010 general election by Muslim tradition.

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 4a

Table 4b

Table 5

Table 6

 

That’s all for today from the EMBES, although I’ll be posting shortly on the ‘Other Religion – write in’ section of the main BES.

Dr Ben Clements
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester

bc101 @ leicester.ac.uk

Posted in Measuring religion, Religion and Politics, Research note | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

National Well-Being

At the request of the Coalition Government, the Office for National Statistics is working to develop new statistical measures of national well-being, covering quality of life and environmental and sustainability issues, as well as the traditional economic performance of the country.

To guide this process, the National Statistician has launched a debate and public consultation on national well-being. It will run until 15 April 2011. Views are sought on a variety of topics, among them the extent to which spirituality and religion matter to people and whether they should be reflected in national measures of well-being.

Input to this dialogue can be made in various ways, including by completing the consultation questionnaire and returning it by email or post, by contributing to a virtual debate website, or by attending workshops. Full details of how to get involved are available at:

http://www.ons.gov.uk/well-being

No faith leaders or faith experts seem to have been appointed to the membership of the Measuring National Well-Being Advisory Forum, which is mainly drawn from the ranks of government, business and academe. Nor, apparently, is the consultation attracting much attention in the faith media.

The BRIN source database – http://www.brin.ac.uk/sources – can be used to identify previous quantitative research into the religious aspects of well-being. Use keyword search terms such as ‘well being’, ‘well-being’ and ‘wellbeing’.

Posted in Measuring religion, Official data, Religion in public debate | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A Perfect Companion

Anybody feeling a little at sea in the plethora of religious data may find a new briefing paper from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) a great boon. Written by EHRC’s research manager, David Perfect, and simply entitled Religion or Belief, it is available to download from:

http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/publications/religion_or_belief_briefing_paper.pdf

The 25-page paper brings together a selection of key national statistics on religion in Great Britain, sometimes as time series. The document is short enough for BRIN readers to consult directly, so no summary of findings will be attempted here. However, an annotated listing of the 19 tables may be found useful.

RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION

1. Religious affiliation, Great Britain, 2001, from Census

2. Religious affiliation, Great Britain, 2004/05-2008/09, from Annual Population Survey

3. Religious affiliation, England, Scotland, Wales, 2001, from Census

4. Religious affiliation, England, Scotland, Wales, 2009/10, from Integrated Household Survey

RELIGIOUS BELONGING

5. Belonging to a religion, Great Britain, 1983, 2008, from British Social Attitudes [BSA] Survey

6. Belonging to a religion by gender, Great Britain, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2008, from BSA

7. Belonging to a religion by age, Great Britain, 2008, from BSA

RELIGIOUS PRACTICE

8. Active practice of religion, England and Wales, 2008/09, from Citizenship Survey

9. Attendance at religious services, Great Britain, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2008, from BSA

10. Church attendance, England, 1979, 1989, 1998, 2005, from English Church Censuses

RELIGIOUS BELIEF

11. Belief in God, Great Britain, 1991, 1998, 2008, from BSA

12. Belief in God, United Kingdom and Europe, 2010, from Eurobarometer  

RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND PREJUDICE

13. Perceptions of religious prejudice, England and Wales, 2005, 2007/08, 2008/09, from Citizenship Survey

14. Perceptions of more religious prejudice by religion, England and Wales, 2005, 2007/08, 2008/09, from Citizenship Survey

15. Perceptions of racial or religious harassment as a big problem, England, 2009/10, from Citizenship Survey

16. Perceptions of widespread discrimination by religion or belief, United Kingdom and Europe, 2009, from Eurobarometer

17. Perceptions of discrimination by equality strand, United Kingdom and Europe, 2009, from Eurobarometer

18. Disposal of Employment Tribunal cases by equality strand, Great Britain, 2009/10, from Employment Tribunal Statistics

19. Female Church of England clergy, England, 2000-09, from Church Statistics  

The paper concludes with a discussion of the sources (pages 20-2), mostly giving online links, and endnotes (pages 23-5).

Posted in church attendance, Measuring religion, Official data | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments